Kvadráty: 6672 5761 5653 6355 6873 6673 5446 5861 6963 5952 6150 5652 6159 5942 5353 5961 7161 7069 6160 5661 5358 6854 6264 7165 5759 6947 6161 7065 7168 5852 5860 6648 5755 6675 6468 5953 5751 5555 5958 6050 5545 5445 6965 6177 6141 6061 5756 6176 6847 7049 6162 6563 5862 5959 6369 6774 5156 6946 6872 7060 6266 6448 6474 5553 6967 6166 6167 7162 6469 6765 6968 7266 5647 5547 5548 6570 5745 5457 6569 5357 6954 6751 6953 6772 6669 6464 7154 7351 6458 5746 6957 6472 6575 5842 5664 7267 5857 6959 6856 6955 7251 6970 7254 6671 6666 6761 6756 6749 6770 6869 6858 7250 7169 7052 6566 7171 6246 7353 5462 6974 5562 6362 6874 7063 6076 6476 6868 6447 7367 5858 7151 7152 6758 5954 7170 5453 5452 6153 5151 5360 5663 5740 5640 5641 6864 5350 5853 6240 6341 6357 6053 6551 5541 5741 5450 5960 5352 6859 6958 7057 7159 7262 5660 6152 5957 5454 6249 5552 5361 6557 5544 5363 5456 6558 5962 5965 6065 5964 5557 6964 5855 6456 6656 5951 6572 6573 6773 6272 5250 5971 7072 5259 7071 6052 5150 6755 6757 6347 6349 6348 7263 6555 5362 6663 6273 6358 5644 5845 5744 7166 5854 6660 5560 6261 5754 5463 5763 6576 7172 5550 6650 6374 5354 6759 6860 7149 5669 5668 6659 6372 6461 6766 6361 6360 5768 6658 5769 6252 6661 5551 5667 6049 7053 6568 5949 6048 5948 5848 5849 6477 5770 5567 6175 6952 5448 6863 5863 7048 6063 6062 6852 6457 6649 7148 5870 5969 5963 6274 6644 6764 5749 6248 6451 6260 6259 6546 5656 5758 5359 5449 6256 6356 7155 7055 7054 6051 5753 5868 6752 6862 6548 5461 6057 6865 5950 6251 5649 6149 6845 5840 5251 5851
  Records by time  
Philodromidae 0-19001901-19501951-20002001+
Philodromus albidus Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 Not endangered 99× 65× 165×
Philodromus aureolus Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) Not endangered 11× 167× 59× 243×
Philodromus buchari Philodromus buchari Kubcová, 2004 Almost threatened 10× 10×
Philodromus buxi Philodromus buxi Simon, 1884
Philodromus cespitum Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) Not endangered 277× 57× 344×
Philodromus collinus Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 Not endangered 262× 44× 317×
Philodromus dispar Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 Not endangered 10× 20× 76× 68× 174×
Philodromus emarginatus Philodromus emarginatus (Schrank, 1803) Almost threatened 12× 24× 45×
Philodromus fuscomarginatus Philodromus fuscomarginatus (De Geer, 1778) Endangered 16× 19× 43×
Philodromus margaritatus Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) Endangered 11× 17× 17× 53×
Philodromus marmoratus Philodromus marmoratus Kulczyński, 1891 Strongly endangered
Philodromus poecilus Philodromus poecilus (Thorell, 1872) Criticaly endangered
Philodromus praedatus Philodromus praedatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 Almost threatened 10× 15× 25×
Philodromus rufus Philodromus rufus Walckenaer, 1826 Strongly endangered 10×

Bibliography

 © Oto Zimmermann

Wolbachia is known to manipulate a host’s reproduction to promote its own transmission. However, recent studies show that it can influence some behavioural processes in hosts, including personality, and personality-related behaviours. So far, information about the effects of Wolbachia infection on the host’s non-reproductive behaviours is still very limited. Here, we studied the effect of infection by Wolbachia on the personality, locomotion, capture rate, and pesticide exposure of the agriculturally important spider, Philodromus cespitum (Philodromidae). We assayed naturally-infected and uninfected individuals for the two personality traits boldness and aggressiveness. We also recorded the locomotion and capture rate of each spider. All individuals were then tested for pesticide avoidance. We found that Wolbachia-infected (no Cardinium detected) individuals were bolder but less aggressive than uninfected ones. The presence of Wolbachia did not affect personality consistency nor capture rate or locomotion; however, it hampered the ability of the spider to avoid a pesticide-treated surface. We conclude that the alteration of personality may not bring a direct transmission benefit to Wolbachia; however, Wolbachia still causes changes in the spider’s ability to perceive pesticide, which might likely be a side effect rather than a result of manipulation.



 © Oto Zimmermann
Pavouci České republiky; Pavučenka dlouhovlasá po dlouhé době!; Významné nálezy pavouků od Nových Mlýnů aneb najde ten, kdo nehledá; Můžeme v terénu či z fotografií spolehlivě rozeznat středoevropské křižáky rodu Zygiella?; Fenomén rekultivací v povrchových dolech pod Krušnými horami a výskyt pavouků; Výskyt pavučenky Staveleya pusilla (Menge, 1869) také v severozápadních Čechách; Dovolená s pavouky; Poznámka k výskytu sekáče Nemastoma bidentatum sparsum (Gruber & Martens, 1968) v Ohřeckém údolí; Inventarizace 2021; Výzva k spolupráci na World Spider Trait databáze; Kutilky (Sphecidae) – specialisté na lov pavouků XI: Sceliphron, Trypoxylon, Pison a Miscopus; Lumci bez křídel; Byli jsme na arachnologické konferenci v německém Greifswaldu!; Pozdně letní exkurze na Mostecko; 119. seminář České arachnologické společnosti; Česká bibliografie; Nové knihy; Pokyny pro autory

During the ethological research of Larinia elegans on Nové Mlýny dam in South Moravia, several spiders were collected, among which we highlight rare philodromids associated with wet biotopes, Philodromus poecilus and Philodromus marmoratus. Theridion familiare was caught in a mobile home near the dam, which is the first record for Czechia.

 © Oto Zimmermann
Populations of generalist predators are often comprised of a mixture of specialist and generalist individuals and this intraspecific variation in prey utilization may affect pest suppression. However, little is known about sea­sonal changes in prey utilization by generalist predators, especially during winter, when some generalist pred­ators exert strong biocontrol effects. We used prey preference experiments on Philodromus cespitum (Araneae: Philodromidae) and molecular gut-content analyses of Philodromus spp. (dominated 85% by Philodromus cespitum) to study the dynamics of spider specialization in a pear orchard during the non-growing season. In the laboratory, Philodromus cespitum preferred springtails (Collembola) over the pear psylla, Cacopsylla pyri, an important pest of pear. The presence of springtails in guts of Philodromus spp. did not affect detection of psylla by molecular gut-content analysis in specimens collected from the pear orchard. The philodromid population comprised of a mixture of specialists and generalists in winter, but was composed mainly of generalists in spring. Greater variation in prey utilization during winter most likely reflects a patchy distribution of prey and philodromids switching to a less active hunting mode. Seasonal specialization of individual generalist predators could be the result of their ability to change hunting mode in response to changing environmental conditions and prey distribution. Our study demonstrates that alternative (collembolan) prey are unlikely to affect philodromid predation on psyllids and suggests that changes occur in the spatial structure of predator-pest interactions from winter to spring.

 © Oto Zimmermann
Insecticide formulations can cause mortality in natural enemies or have sublethal effects on them, which include alterations in their behaviour and development. Here, we investigated the effect of a bioinsecticide (azadirachtin) and predator cues on mating in a biocontrol spider, Philodromus cespitum. Firstly, adult males were exposed to cues from ants (as predators) or conspecific juveniles (as controls) and those from virgin adult females combined with insecticide residues and we then recorded their selection of the respective surfaces. In an insecticide-free environment, males spent significantly more time on the surface with cues from juveniles and virgin females than on the surface with cues from ants and virgin females. In the environment with ant cues, males did not spend significantly more time on the surface treated with water or insecticide residues. Secondly, adult male and female spiders were exposed to cues from predators and conspecifics and fresh insecticide residuals and we recorded mating behaviour. The presence of ant cues nor the presence of insecticide residues had a significant effect on the mating behaviour. However, the frequency of females biting males was significantly lower on the surface with insecticide residues and ant cues and highest on the surface with ant cues and water treatment. The size of mating plugs (applied to female genitals by males during mating) was not different between ant cues and control, but the plugs were significantly larger on the surface with insecticide residues. We conclude that azadirachtin affected only slightly the perception of predation risk and consequently mating behaviour in Philodromus cespitum. Similarly, presence of ant cues had little effect on mating.

 © Oto Zimmermann
The goals of this study are 1) to present the results of a new faunistic survey carried out during short, mainly spring vacation trips, through four years (2012–2014 and 2017) in different sites in Albania; 2) to present digital images of some poorly illustrated and difficult to identify species; 3) to make a contribution to the available knowledge of the Albanian spider fauna. Despite the material being collected without prior methodology and almost exclusively by hand, overall, 1231 individuals were collected and identified. A total of 242 species were registered, belonging to 131 genera and 30 families. Two species (Philodromus buchari Kubcová 2004 and Synema ornatum (Thorell, 1875)) are reported for the first time from the Balkan Peninsula, and 67 species and 15 genera are the first records for Albania. Thus, the actual number of Albanian spiders increased to 569 species.

 © Ondřej Machač
Pavouci České republiky; Steatoda nobilis – černý pasažér přistižen v ČR; Dolomedes; Proč si myslím, že to je Palliduphantes pillichi (Kulczyński, 1915) (aneb hozená rukavice nebo ručník); Nález snovačky kuželové Achaeridion conigerum (Simon, 1914) v Krušných horách; Poznámka k článku Snovačka půdní (Steatoda triangulosa) ve volné přírodě v ČR; Třesavka jižní (Holocnemus pluchei) – poznámky z předvánočního úklidu v Brně: Překvapivý nález; Pavouci (Araneae) bývalé pískovny v Komořanech v Praze; Žluté misky – méně obvyklá metoda odchytu pavouků; Hrabalky (Pompilidae) – specialisté na lov pavouků V: rod Episyron; Krátké ohlédnutí za zářijovou exkurzí na Radotínských skalách; Slovenská arachnologická konference ve Východné; 117. Arachnologický seminář v Plzni; Česká bibliografie; Britská bibliografie - The Newsletter 145; Nové knihy; Pokyny pro autory

 © Oto Zimmermann
Seminatural habitats adjacent to crops often increase density and diversity of pests’ natural enemies in crops. However, there is no research investigating the effect of seminatural habitats on the intraspecific variation in functional traits of the pests’ natural enemies in agricultural landscapes, despite its significant impact on pest control. Here, we investigated whether there is intraspecific variation in functional traits of a potential biocontrol agent, the generalist spider Philodromus cespitum, depending on the location in an agricultural landscape. We compared size, capture rate, and fundamental trophic niche of Philodromus cespitum along five transects (60 m) each consisting of three plots: hedgerow adjacent to an apple orchard, orchard edge, and orchard centre. The individuals from the orchard centers were larger than the individuals from orchard edges and hedgerows. Large individuals from the orchard centers had higher capture rate than large individuals from hedgerows but in small individuals it was the opposite. The adult females from the centers had a wider trophic niche than those from hedgerows, indicating higher foraging opportunism. The individuals from orchard edges had moderate phenotype in both trophic traits. The individuals from the orchard edges were also the most heterogeneous in body size and capture rate. The results show a clear edge effect which means that the hedgerows influenced the intraspecific functional composition in the orchard. As the intraspecific variation can interact with the species’ densities in influencing pest control, ignoring the intraspecific variation in the agricultural landscape and crops may lead to an inaccurate inference about the biocontrol services provided by spiders.

 © Oto Zimmermann
Female mating history can have a strong effect on male fertilization success. Although males often prefer to mate with virgin females, they often also engage with mated females. As the intensity of sperm competition can differ among mated females, males are expected to evolve means to identify their status. In spiders, males often use female silk to gather information about female quality. Males of many spider species deposit mating plugs into female genitalia to hinder further copulations. We tested whether males of the foliage‐dwelling, plug‐producing spider Philodromus cespitum, which is an important natural enemy of pests, discriminate between females of different mating status and whether they can determine the extent of genital plugging in mated females solely on the basis of cues gained from deposited female silk. We presented males with draglines of females that varied in either mating status (virgin vs. mated), the extent of plugging (small vs. big plug), or the age of the plug (fresh vs. old plug) and examined their mate preferences.  Additionally, we tested whether males were attracted to volatile cues produced by female bodies. Our experiments revealed that males preferred draglines of virgin females to those of mated females, and mated females with small plugs to those with large plugs. They were also attracted to female volatile cues. This study suggests that males are able to extract fine‐scale information on mating status from female draglines.

 © Oto Zimmermann

Cílem mé práce bylo zjistit druhovou diverzitu a početnost pavouků v arboretu Mendelovy univerzity v Brně a také vyvodit jejich význam, a v neposlední řadě též posoudit význam arboret, parků a další městské zeleně coby míst vyšší biologické diverzity v urbanizovaném prostředí.

V rámci výzkumu bylo vybráno patnáct listnatých dřevin, lokalizovaných v různých částech arboreta. Pavouci byli získávání pomocí dvou odchytových metod, metodou sklepávání a metodou výběru z kartonových pásů (pastí). Sklepávání proběhlo v rámci výzkumu celkem čtyřikrát, konkrétně 11. 5. 2017, 14. 6. 2017, 1. 8. 2017 a 18. 9. 2017. Výběr z kartonových pásů byl proveden dvakrát, 28. 6. 2017 a 19. 10. 2017.

V obou metodách bylo získáno a determinováno celkem 303 adultních jedinců pavouků náležejících do 45 druhů, 36 rodů a 14 čeledí. Nejpočetněji zastoupen byl druh Philodromus cespitum, který tvořil více než třetinu odchyceného materiálu (přes 33 %). Tento druh patří mezi druhy schopné žít i v narušených biotopech urbanizovaných lokalit, jeho značné zastoupení je tedy očekávatelné. V rámci výzkumu bylo však získáno i několik druhů ohrožených, které se vyskytují pouze v přirozeném prostředí méně narušených biotopů.

Z tohoto faktu lze tedy dovodit závěr, že prostředí arboreta tvoří alespoň částečně přirozené prostředí pro výskyt různých druhů, z čehož vyplývá, že arboreta, parky a další zeleň ve městech, jsou tedy skutečně místem biodiverzity. Tento závěr je důležitý i pro arboristickou praxi, stejně jako fakt, že pavouci jsou významní predátoři bezobratlých a je tedy možné je využít v rámci biologické ochrany ve městech (tedy v místech, kde není vhodné používat chemické přípravky pro ochranu rostlin) i mimo ně. Ohrožené a vzácné druhy, které byly v rámci výzkumu v arboretu determinovány, lze také využít pro bioindikaci kvality prostředí v arboretu a obdobně je možné pavouky využít i v městských parcích a další městské zeleni stejně jako i ve volné krajině.



 © Oto Zimmermann

Arachnologický průzkum na Mostecku a Chomutovsku byl doposud soustředěn zejména na Krušné hory (BUCHAR a HAJER 1999, 2005, 2010. ROUŠAR 2011. RŮŽIČKA a HAJER 2002, 2003), jednotlivé sběry z okolí jsou také zahrnuty v katalogu pavouků ČR (BUCHAR a RŮŽIČKA 2002), na Chomutovsku je známo také několik publikovaných sběrů Antonína Roušara (ROUŠAR 2009, 2015, 2016). Přesto údaje o výskytu pavouků z mnoha lokalit scházejí. Proto od 1. do 4. června 2017 uspořádalo Oblastní muzeum v Mostě arachnologické exkurze do nejbližšího okolí Mostu a Chomutova, kterých se zúčastnili členové České arachnologické společnosti. Jako cílové byly zvoleny lokality, na kterých se systematicky pavoukovci dosud nesbírali, ale i lokality, které by vzhledem ke svým přírodním hodnotám mohly být v budoucnu zařazeny mezi zvláště chráněná území. Tento článek předkládá seznam všech druhů pavouků, kteří byli během akce zjištěni.



 © Oto Zimmermann

Even though pesticides can have various sublethal effects on behaviour of biocontrol agents, no study to date has investigated the effects of pesticides on the prey choice of generalist predators. Prey choice of generalist predators is among key factors determining the predation pressure they exert on pests, because it influences fitness of predators and consequently their densities and per capita capture rate. Here, we investigated the effect of Integro (a.i. methoxyfenozide) and SpinTor 480 Sc (a.i. spinosad) on prey choice and predatory activity of the spider Philodromus cespitum, which is known significantly to reduce hemipteran and dipteran pests in fruit orchards. We compared the prey preferences of philodromids between the psyllid pest Cacopsylla pyri (Hemiptera, Psyllidae) and beneficial Theridion sp. spiders in laboratory experiments. We found that both pesticides altered the prey preferences of philodromids. While the philodromids in a control treatment preferred theridiid spiders over the psyllid pest, philodromids in the pesticide treatments exhibited no significant prey preferences. The changes in prey preferences were caused by increased predation on the psyllids, while the predation on the theridiid remained similar. We suggest that the changes in prey preferences might theoretically be due to 1) impaired sensory systems, 2) altered taste, and/or 3) altered mobility. In combination with other studies finding reduced predation on fruit flies in Philodromus cespitum after exposure to SpinTor, our results indicate that the sublethal effects of pesticides on predatory behaviour of generalist predators can depend on prey type and/or prey community composition.



 © Ondřej Machač
Pavouci České republiky; Nový druh třesavky pro území České republiky, aneb další synantrop za dveřmi (nebo před?); Zajímavý nález tropické maloočky v Hranicích na Moravě; Katalogy pavouků a evidence prvonálezů; Snovačka půdní (Steatoda triangulosa) ve volné přírodě v ČR; Poznámka k výskytu listovníků Philodromus margaritatus a P. fuscomarginatusNová lokalita sklípkánka hnědého (Atypus affinis); Zoologické dny Brno 2017; Česko-britský arachnologický seminář v Praze; Exkurze Mohelenský mlýn 2017; Arachnologická exkurze Mostecko 2017; Přírodovědecký spolek Arachne; Obsah původního Arachnologického spravodaje v minulosti; Čestní členové České arachnologické společnosti; Arachnologická knihovna Jiřího Bauma; Česká bibliografie 2017; Britská bibliografie – The Newsletter 138; Inventarizace 2016; Pokyny pro autory

 © Oto Zimmermann

Behavioral syndromes, seen as correlations among two or more functionally different behaviors, are well documented in many different animal taxa. They may not be present automatically, however, and their  consistency within populations and individuals also varies among studies. Here, we studied a behavioral syndrome comprising foraging aggressiveness and boldness/shyness and its time consistency in the cursorial spider Philodromus albidus. We measured foraging aggressiveness as the number of prey killed per 2-hour period. Boldness/shyness was assessed as a latency of initiating exploration in a novel environment. We  found the presence of the behavioral syndrome in Philodromus albidus, as bold individuals were also more aggressive than were shy individuals. The syndrome was consistent through time within the population but not  consistent for individuals. We further discuss the possible causes of the pattern.



 © Oto Zimmermann

Odchyt studovaných organismů byl prováděn v období od dubna do září v roce 2016, ve dvou typech hospodaření a ošetřování ovocných dřevin (ekologický sad a intenzivní sad). Všechny studované plochy se nacházejí v okrese Vsetín (Zlínský kraj). V ekologických sadech byly sklepávány hrušně (Pyrus), jabloně (Malus) a slivoně (Prunus). V intenzivních sadech byly sklepávány pouze slivoně (Prunus). Na každé lokalitě bylo vybráno 10 vhodných dřevin, na kterých probíhalo pravidelné sklepávání hmyzu a pavouků. Celkem bylo posbíráno 875 jedinců. Nejpočetnější skupinou ve zkoumaných šesti sadech byli pavouci, ve studovaném materiálu se nacházelo 683 jedinců. Nejpočetnější byly druhy Philodromus sp., Philodromus albidus, Philodromus dispar, Philodromus cespitum, Nigma flavescens, Phylloneta impressa, Nuctenea umbratica, Anyphaena accentuata. Antagonistů z třídy hmyzu bylo ve studovaném materiálu 192 jedinců. Nejvyšší počet pavouků byl v ekologických sadech, celkem jich bylo nasbíráno 470 jedinců, zástupců hmyzu bylo nasbíráno 106 jedinců. Z toho největší počet byl z čeledi Coccinellidae 54 jedinců. Dále bylo nasbíráno kolem 30 jedinců z čeledi Formicidae a Anthrocoridae. U intenzivních sadů byla početnost pavouků nižší, bylo nasbíráno 214 jedinců. Užiteční zástupci hmyzu se vyskytovali také v menších počtech, bylo jich nasbíráno celkem 86 jedinců. Nejpočetnější čeledí byli Coccinellidae (38 jedinců). Z výsledků lze konstatovat, že v ekologických sadech s  heterogenní dřevinou skladbou je druhová diverzita mnohem vyšší, než u sadů s intenzivnějším hospodařením, kde druhová diverzita a početnost měla sestupnou tendenci s výrazně slabší celkovou rozmanitostí přirozených antagonistů.

Výsledky tohoto výzkumu aplikovaného na ovocné dřeviny v sadech můžeme vztáhnout i na parky, zahrady, případně arboreta a jinou veřejnou zeleň, protože v těchto biotopech se obecně vyskytuje značná druhová diverzita pavouků a antagonistů z třídy hmyzu, která je ovšem náchylná na různé zásahy a intenzitu hospodaření. Tím může být narušena jejich funkční významnost z hlediska biologické kontroly škůdců.



 © Oto Zimmermann

Abstract The impact of five selective insecticides on the functional response of a potential biological control agent, the spider Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer) (Araneae: Philodromidae), was studied in the laboratory. This spider is the most abundant beneficial arthropod on trees in commercial orchards in central Europe. We expected that selective insecticides applied at the recommended doses would have no effect or a negligible effect on the spiders’ performance. Our results showed that the mortality of spiders resulting from residual uptake of the chem- icals differed among insecticides. Dimilin, NeemAzal, Mospilan, and Integro caused mortality of less than 10%, while SpinTor caused mortality of 17%. All five preparations can be considered harmless in terms of mortality in comparison with Decis, which caused 80% mortality. Exposure to residues of NeemAzal, SpinTor, and Dimilin resulted in a significantly lower predation rate than the control. The lowest predation rate was observed in spiders treated with SpinTor. These results imply that the natural pest control provided by Philodromus cespitum spiders can be weakened by the application of SpinTor, NeemAzal, and Dimilin. On the other hand, the functional response was not significantly affected by the application of Integro and Mospilan. Therefore, these two insecticides are recommended for use in the integrated pest management (IPM) of orchards.



Gallery

Philodromus albidus
Philodromus aureolus
Philodromus buchari
Philodromus buxi
Philodromus cespitum
Philodromus collinus
Philodromus dispar
Philodromus emarginatus
Philodromus fuscomarginatus
Philodromus margaritatus
Philodromus marmoratus
Philodromus poecilus
Philodromus praedatus
Philodromus rufus

Statistics

By month


By altitude


By collecting method (1434 used records)
NeurčenoMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 7 16 1 27
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 20 42 6 87
Philodromus buchari Kubcová, 2004 0 22 0 5
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 23 31 1 55
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 32 53 5 86
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 22 22 1 74
Philodromus emarginatus (Schrank, 1803) 1 8 0 22
Philodromus fuscomarginatus (De Geer, 1778) 9 17 1 20
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 2 5 2 26
Philodromus marmoratus Kulczyński, 1891 0 0 0 1
Philodromus poecilus (Thorell, 1872) 1 0 0 1
Philodromus praedatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 2 3 0 9
Philodromus rufus Walckenaer, 1826 0 1 0 5
SklepáváníMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 3 25 0 22
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 25 61 0 48
Philodromus buchari Kubcová, 2004 1 0 0 1
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 92 137 2 120
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 86 113 31 75
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 0 7 0 5
Philodromus emarginatus (Schrank, 1803) 0 4 6 6
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 1 7 3 4
Philodromus praedatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 3 2 0 5
Philodromus rufus Walckenaer, 1826 1 4 0 3
Individuální sběrMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 11 22 1 26
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 16 37 0 43
Philodromus buxi Simon, 1884 1 0 0 1
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 28 47 2 59
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 25 16 0 39
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 16 35 0 38
Philodromus emarginatus (Schrank, 1803) 1 1 7 3
Philodromus fuscomarginatus (De Geer, 1778) 1 14 2 17
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 4 7 3 13
Philodromus marmoratus Kulczyński, 1891 1 2 0 2
Philodromus poecilus (Thorell, 1872) 0 5 0 3
Philodromus praedatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 4 1 0 4
Philodromus rufus Walckenaer, 1826 0 1 0 1
SmykMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 21 23 0 40
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 10 17 1 26
Philodromus buchari Kubcová, 2004 0 2 0 2
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 14 69 1 67
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 40 51 0 57
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 27 33 5 29
Philodromus emarginatus (Schrank, 1803) 1 4 0 4
Philodromus fuscomarginatus (De Geer, 1778) 0 1 0 1
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 1 0 0 1
Zemní pastMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 12 10 5 19
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 33 44 2 29
Philodromus buchari Kubcová, 2004 0 2 0 2
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 51 24 4 29
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 45 15 0 50
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 19 25 0 19
Philodromus emarginatus (Schrank, 1803) 2 4 0 7
Philodromus fuscomarginatus (De Geer, 1778) 1 1 0 3
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 2 0 0 2
Philodromus rufus Walckenaer, 1826 0 1 0 1
ProsevMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 4 0 0 2
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 2 5 0 6
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 5 6 0 10
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 4 7 0 9
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 2 0 0 3
Philodromus emarginatus (Schrank, 1803) 1 2 0 3
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 2 0 0 2
Nárazová pastMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 14 6 0 17
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 0 1 0 1
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 0 2 0 3
Philodromus praedatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 2 3 0 5
EklektorMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 1 8 0 8
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 1 2 0 3
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 0 2 0 2
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 0 1 0 1
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 0 0 0 1
Philodromus praedatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 1 0 0 1
FotografieMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 1 0 0 2
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 1 0 0 1
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 1 0 0 1
Philodromus fuscomarginatus (De Geer, 1778) 0 1 0 2
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 1 2 0 3
Žlutá miskaMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 1 0 0 1
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 1 0 0 1
Philodromus praedatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 0 1 0 1
PozorováníMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 0 0 0 1
 MalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords

By biotope (1435 used records)
NeurčenoMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 26 16 1 41
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 26 29 3 98
Philodromus buchari Kubcová, 2004 0 24 0 7
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 64 42 2 80
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 36 36 3 95
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 34 32 1 88
Philodromus emarginatus (Schrank, 1803) 3 6 0 25
Philodromus fuscomarginatus (De Geer, 1778) 4 13 1 19
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 3 5 2 27
Philodromus marmoratus Kulczyński, 1891 0 0 0 1
Philodromus poecilus (Thorell, 1872) 1 0 0 1
Philodromus praedatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 5 1 0 11
Philodromus rufus Walckenaer, 1826 1 3 0 6
Ovocné sady s luční vegetacíMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 6 11 0 14
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 9 17 0 20
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 85 106 0 97
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 3 0 0 2
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 1 1 0 2
Philodromus rufus Walckenaer, 1826 0 1 0 1
Výsadby jehličnanůMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 0 1 0 1
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 3 11 0 9
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 0 4 1 4
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 22 23 0 26
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 3 0 0 3
Philodromus fuscomarginatus (De Geer, 1778) 0 4 1 5
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 1 7 1 5
Lesní okrajeMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 3 7 0 9
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 5 10 0 14
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 9 15 0 12
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 1 4 0 5
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 5 5 1 7
Philodromus emarginatus (Schrank, 1803) 0 2 0 2
Philodromus fuscomarginatus (De Geer, 1778) 0 1 0 2
Philodromus praedatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 0 1 0 1
Suché loukyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 1 3 0 3
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 7 11 0 14
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 2 11 0 12
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 9 19 0 13
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 2 3 0 4
Philodromus emarginatus (Schrank, 1803) 1 4 0 2
Philodromus fuscomarginatus (De Geer, 1778) 0 0 0 1
Philodromus rufus Walckenaer, 1826 0 1 0 1
MočályMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 0 1 0 1
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 1 5 0 4
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 1 9 0 7
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 18 27 8 16
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 1 4 0 2
Philodromus emarginatus (Schrank, 1803) 0 3 0 4
Mokré loukyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 2 3 0 4
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 0 3 0 2
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 3 7 0 9
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 9 13 0 17
Philodromus emarginatus (Schrank, 1803) 0 0 5 2
Lužní lesy nížinMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 3 9 0 12
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 2 3 0 2
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 2 2 0 4
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 0 1 0 1
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 1 3 0 4
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 1 1 0 1
Philodromus marmoratus Kulczyński, 1891 0 2 0 1
Philodromus praedatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 2 1 0 3
Philodromus rufus Walckenaer, 1826 0 1 0 1
Suché doubravyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 1 7 5 7
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 4 3 0 7
Philodromus buchari Kubcová, 2004 0 1 0 1
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 1 3 0 3
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 2 0 0 2
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 9 14 0 8
Xerotermní travinobylinná společenstvaMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 2 1 0 3
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 3 6 0 5
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 9 9 0 8
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 2 8 0 4
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 4 4 0 4
Philodromus emarginatus (Schrank, 1803) 0 1 0 1
Philodromus fuscomarginatus (De Geer, 1778) 0 1 0 1
RašeliništěMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 0 6 0 4
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 0 5 0 4
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 9 12 10 14
Philodromus emarginatus (Schrank, 1803) 0 0 8 2
PísčinyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 1 2 0 3
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 2 2 0 3
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 2 5 0 4
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 3 4 0 5
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 0 1 0 1
Philodromus fuscomarginatus (De Geer, 1778) 0 1 0 1
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 3 1 3 5
LesyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 1 2 0 3
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 2 2 0 5
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 0 1 0 1
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 4 1 0 4
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 2 1 0 3
Philodromus fuscomarginatus (De Geer, 1778) 1 2 0 3
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 0 1 0 1
LoukyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 1 4 0 5
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 0 3 0 2
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 3 3 0 4
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 4 6 0 5
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 3 2 0 3
Philodromus praedatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 1 0 0 1
Suché křovinyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 3 3 0 7
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 0 0 0 1
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 1 5 0 6
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 2 0 0 2
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 1 1 0 2
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 1 0 0 1
Lesy vyšších poloh a strmých svahůMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 1 3 1 4
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 10 15 2 14
Reliktní bory na skaláchMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 6 25 0 5
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 2 5 0 1
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 15 13 0 4
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 1 0 0 1
Philodromus emarginatus (Schrank, 1803) 1 0 0 1
Philodromus fuscomarginatus (De Geer, 1778) 0 2 1 3
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 1 0 0 1
Philodromus praedatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 0 1 0 1
Lesostepní doubravyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 5 2 0 5
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 2 4 0 2
Philodromus buchari Kubcová, 2004 1 0 0 1
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 2 3 0 4
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 1 5 0 4
Philodromus praedatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 0 2 0 1
Bučiny nižších polohMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 0 2 0 2
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 1 6 0 3
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 0 1 0 1
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 3 2 0 5
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 1 3 0 4
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 1 0 0 1
Přirozené lesyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 1 3 0 3
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 0 4 6 4
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 1 1 0 1
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 6 1 1 7
Těžebny písku a jiných nezpevněných horninMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 0 2 0 2
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 1 0 0 1
Philodromus buchari Kubcová, 2004 0 1 0 1
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 0 4 1 4
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 1 1 0 2
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 0 1 0 1
Philodromus fuscomarginatus (De Geer, 1778) 0 2 0 2
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 0 1 0 1
Břehy tekoucích vodMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 1 4 0 5
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 0 2 0 2
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 0 2 0 2
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 0 2 0 2
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 2 4 0 1
Philodromus emarginatus (Schrank, 1803) 0 1 0 1
Philodromus praedatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 1 0 0 1
Luční ostřicové mokřadyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 1 1 0 2
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 32 22 0 11
Philodromus praedatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 0 1 0 1
PasekyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 2 1 0 3
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 0 1 0 1
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 5 1 1 5
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 3 2 0 4
Philodromus emarginatus (Schrank, 1803) 0 1 0 1
Zahradnicky utvářené zahrady a parkyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 3 4 1 6
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 2 0 0 3
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 0 0 0 1
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 1 0 0 1
Philodromus praedatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 1 1 0 2
Mezofilní loukyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 0 2 0 2
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 1 1 0 2
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 4 8 0 5
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 0 1 0 1
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 2 2 0 2
Výsadby listnáčůMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 3 4 0 3
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 19 29 0 3
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 1 0 7 2
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 5 12 1 4
Horské smrčinyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 0 5 0 2
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 0 1 0 1
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 0 1 0 1
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 4 5 0 6
Philodromus fuscomarginatus (De Geer, 1778) 0 1 0 1
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 0 0 1 1
ÚhoryMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 2 7 0 8
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 0 1 0 1
Philodromus emarginatus (Schrank, 1803) 0 3 0 2
Suťové a roklinové lesyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 0 1 0 1
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 1 3 0 3
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 1 0 0 1
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 2 4 0 6
KamenolomyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 1 0 0 1
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 1 2 0 2
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 2 6 0 5
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 0 1 0 1
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 1 1 0 2
Acidofilní boryMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 0 3 0 2
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 2 1 0 3
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 2 8 0 2
Philodromus emarginatus (Schrank, 1803) 1 0 0 1
Philodromus fuscomarginatus (De Geer, 1778) 1 1 0 2
Rákosiny a orobincové porosty stojatých vodMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 1 2 0 2
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 1 8 0 3
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 0 1 0 1
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 4 5 0 2
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 0 1 0 1
Philodromus emarginatus (Schrank, 1803) 0 2 0 1
Interiéry budovMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 2 0 0 2
Philodromus buxi Simon, 1884 1 0 0 1
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 3 1 0 4
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 0 1 0 1
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 0 1 0 1
DubohabřinyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 2 3 0 3
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 3 5 0 6
Vrbové křoviny - vlhké (vrbové) křovinyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 2 1 0 2
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 0 3 0 3
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 1 1 1 2
Philodromus poecilus (Thorell, 1872) 0 3 0 1
Horské bučinyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 1 0 0 1
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 1 3 0 3
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 2 0 3 3
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 0 2 0 1
RuderályMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 0 3 0 3
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 1 2 0 4
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 0 2 0 1
Porosty borůvekMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 1 4 0 2
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 1 1 0 2
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 1 2 1 3
Philodromus praedatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 0 1 0 1
Stinné skály nižších polohMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 0 1 0 1
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 1 1 0 2
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 4 7 0 4
Bylinné porosty břehůMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 0 1 0 1
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 1 6 0 3
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 1 3 0 3
Mokřadní olšinyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 2 1 0 3
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 1 0 0 1
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 0 1 0 1
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 0 1 0 1
Skalní stepi na vápenciMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 0 1 0 1
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 0 1 0 1
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 0 4 0 2
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 0 1 0 1
PastvinyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 0 0 0 1
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 1 1 1 1
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 3 2 0 3
Louky a pastvinyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 0 2 0 1
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 0 1 0 1
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 2 2 0 3
Vnější stěny budovMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 1 1 0 2
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 0 0 1 2
Philodromus poecilus (Thorell, 1872) 0 1 0 1
Okraje silnicMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 1 1 0 2
Philodromus marmoratus Kulczyński, 1891 1 0 0 1
Philodromus poecilus (Thorell, 1872) 0 1 0 1
Philodromus praedatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 2 0 0 1
Suché lesní lemyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 1 1 0 2
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 1 1 0 2
Philodromus fuscomarginatus (De Geer, 1778) 5 5 0 1
Lesní cestaMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 1 0 0 1
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 1 2 0 2
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 0 1 0 1
Haldy a výsypkyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 4 2 4 4
Kamenité suti nižších polohMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 0 1 0 1
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 0 1 0 1
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 4 3 0 2
Vlhké doubravyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 1 0 0 1
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 0 1 0 1
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 0 1 0 1
Stojaté a pomalu tekoucí vodyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 1 0 0 1
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 0 3 0 2
Travnaté stepiMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 1 2 0 3
LesyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 0 0 0 1
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 0 1 0 1
Philodromus praedatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 0 1 0 1
ZahradyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 0 0 0 1
Philodromus margaritatus (Clerck, 1757) 0 1 0 2
Ovocné sady a vinohradyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 1 0 0 1
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 1 0 0 1
Vlhké lesní lemyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 0 2 0 1
Philodromus dispar Walckenaer, 1826 0 1 2 1
Skalní a suťové biotopyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 2 0 0 2
Pozemní komunikaceMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 1 0 0 1
Philodromus fuscomarginatus (De Geer, 1778) 0 1 0 1
Podmáčené smrčinyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 5 2 0 2
Vřesoviště nižších polohMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 0 2 0 2
Ostřicové porosty stojatých vodMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus aureolus (Clerck, 1757) 0 1 0 1
Ostatní poleMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 0 1 0 1
Mokřadní vrbinyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 0 1 0 1
Skalní stepi na jiných hornináchMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus rufus Walckenaer, 1826 0 1 0 1
Nízké xerofilní křovinyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 0 4 0 1
Písčité břehyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus albidus Kulczyński, 1911 0 1 0 1
Polní biotopyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 0 1 0 1
LoukyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus cespitum (Walckenaer, 1802) 0 1 0 1
Horské biotopyMalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords
Philodromus collinus C. L. Koch, 1835 0 1 0 1
 MalesFemalesJuvenilesRecords